National parks threatened by introduction of commercial honeybees
Native insects have seen a dramatic loss in numbers during the recent ÐÓ°ÉÖ±²¥n bushfires.
In an article featured in the , the ÐÓ°ÉÖ±²¥ of Adelaide’s Associate Professor talks about the considerable losses sustained by honeybee industry in the recent fires. This has led to commercial beekeepers pushing for access to move commercial hives in to national parksÌýand other unburnt public land.
Native bee pollination is essential for sustaining healthy ecosystems and pollinating native plants. However the European honeybee was brought to ÐÓ°ÉÖ±²¥ for commercial honey production and pollination services for crops such as apples, almonds and lucerne.
If introduced beehives are moved into national parks, they would compromise these valuable places for conservation and increase competition with native birds, mammals and other insects which rely on the same nectar from flowers. Honeybees pollinate certain plant species over others and many native plant species are not pollinated or pollinated inefficiently by them. They pollinate invasive weeds, such asÌýgorse,ÌýlantanaÌýandÌýscotch broom which have adapted to recover and spread after fire, making them very expensive to control.
The demand for commercial beekeeping in national parks is a result of native vegetation being cleared for agriculture in many parts of ÐÓ°ÉÖ±²¥, with increasing demand following the devastating fires.
A short term solution is for beekeepers to artificiallyÌýfeedÌýtheir hives with sugar syrup, as is common practise in winter. Thus, they could continue to produce honey and provide commercial pollination services. A long-term solution is to increase the area of native vegetation for both biodiversity and commercial beekeeping, by stepping up ÐÓ°ÉÖ±²¥â€™sÌýmeagreÌýre-vegetation programs.

Newsletter & social media
Join us for a sensational mix of news, events and research at the Environment Institute. Find out aboutÌýnew initiatives andÌýshare with your friends what's happening.
ÌýÌýÌý